Let us take a closer look at Azure DDoS protection vs Cloudflare to determine which is the right choice for you.  With the support of Sever management support services, we can give you a detailed note on Azure vs Cloudflare to choose the best.

Pros: Azure DDoS protection vs Cloudflare

Azure DDoS

• The high efficiency and performance of Azure DDoS Protection make it unique and extremely useful.
• Individuals who frequently utilize Microsoft products, they can easily implement or integrate any features or products.

Cloudflare:

• Includes Key items such as the Lambda and DNS.
• It’s incredibly simple to use.
• The most valuable component of the solution is the DDoS defense.
• A novel and inventive approach to protecting the client’s data.

Azure DDoS protection vs Cloudflare: Cons    

Azure DDoS

• Azure DDoS Protection’s reporting requires more improvement.
• As there are continual modifications, it can be difficult for our team to keep track of changes (in the GUI) between different projects.
• As a result, it is difficult to manage, recall, and see all of the features because of the relocation.

Cloudflare:

• The solution may end out being less expensive. It is very expensive to use.
• Latencies are always an issue.
• The CDN services are having some troubles.

Azure DDoS Protection vs Cloudflare: Pricing and Cost Advice

Azure DDoS:We have the option to test it for free for a set amount of time and set up a free account.

We can evaluate it and compare its advantages and disadvantages to those of other items we are testing.

Cloudflare: Cloudflare has a moderate and cost-effective pricing structure.

How do Cloudflare and Microsoft (Azure DDos protection) Differentiate in Protecting Against DDoS Attacks?

• Microsoft provides WAF functionalities as part of the Azure Application Gateway service. This enables for blocking against OWASP top ten and custom criteria, but does not provide rate limitation.
• Microsoft’s rate restriction tools are only available as part of the Azure Front Door WAF solution. This rate limit will connect to each client’s IP address that attempts to connect.
• Another issue is that Microsoft WAF only offers a few distinct actions, which are either LOG / BLOCK / ACCEPT. So in this case we cannot define JS challenges or more complicated actions to be executed with Azure WAF.
• Cloudflare offers rate limiting with varying features according on SKU level. (Along with geo-blocking, OWASP, and custom rules.)

  More advanced actions, such as JS challenge, can also be made available, and custom actions, such as forwarding users to a custom error page, can be defined.
• Cloudflare-like Front Door rules are activated at the Edge.

  This means that if we have a web service in Amsterdam but the users are from Australia, the various rules are processed at one of the PoP’s in Australia before reaching the web service.
• Cloudflare DDoS protection for layers 3 – 5; is set by default and can be significantly less expensive depending on the company’s size. It only costs roughly $200 per month for smaller businesses.

[Need assistance with similar queries? We are here to help]

Conclusion

To conclude we have gone through the azure DDoS protection vs Cloudflare to determine which is the best with the support of server management support services.